How much does Salesloft cost?

Salesloft does not publish a price. We checked on 6 October 2026: salesloft.com/pricing returns a redirect and lands on salesloft.com/see-it-live, a page titled Talk to Sales. There are no package names, no tiers and no dollar figures anywhere on it. The only numbers it carries are marketing claims: 3x faster ROI, 12+ hrs saved per rep weekly, and 40% more selling activity. The form asks for a business email and offers a quick intro call, a tailored walkthrough and a follow up. So any article telling you an alternative is cheaper than Salesloft is comparing a published number against a number nobody outside the deal has. Salesloft is a quoted purchase, priced per seat against the product mix you take, and you will not learn the figure without a sales conversation.

Does Salesloft coach reps during a live call?

Yes, and we are not going to argue otherwise. Salesloft's Conversation Intelligence page, read 6 October 2026, says it will Give reps real-time AI guidance during calls to handle objections, navigate tough conversations, and deliver confident responses that move deals forward. The same page says Battlecards surface in real time on every call. So the common sales pitch against Salesloft, that it only tells you what went wrong the next morning, is false. The honest distinction is the mechanism, not the timing. A battlecard is a card somebody on your team wrote in advance and stored, and it appears when the system matches a trigger. That works well on the objections you already anticipated, and it shows nothing for an objection phrased in a way no card covers.

Did Salesloft and Clari merge?

Yes, and the merger is now visible in the URLs rather than only in a press release. Salesloft's own announcement of 2 September 2026 says Less than a year after joining forces with Clari, Salesloft brings two category leaders together under one company, one strategy and one brand, that Salesloft is now the company and platform brand going forward, and that Clari Forecast retains the Clari name. The same release states Salesloft is trusted by more than 4,000 organizations including Adobe, 3M, IBM, and Zoom. We measured the consequences on 6 October 2026 with redirect following switched off: clari.com returns HTTP 301 to www.salesloft.com, so the Clari marketing site no longer exists as a destination. The application did not move: copilot.clari.com still returns HTTP 200 and its title tag today is Salesloft CI. And the login menu on salesloft.com lists five separate logins: Log in to Salesloft, Log in to Clari Forecast, Log in to Conversations, Log in to Drift, Log in to Groove. That is the shape of a platform assembled from acquisitions, and it is a real thing a buyer feels in month two.

Which Salesloft alternative publishes a price?

We opened twelve pricing pages on 6 October 2026 and four of them printed a number. Avoma publishes $19, $29 and $39 per recorder seat per month on annual billing, with a Conversation Intelligence add-on at $29 per seat per month annually, which makes about $48 per seat the cheapest published route to during-call objection cards that we can find. Trellus publishes $99.99 and $149.99 per month with both discounted to $34.99 on the page today. Oliv publishes $19, $49 and $79 per user per month plus a $0 tier. Objeq, whose site this is, publishes $99 and $149 per seat per month. Five pricing pages exist and carry no dollar figure at all: Salesloft, which redirects to a Talk to Sales form, Revenue.io, Outreach, Gong and Artisan. Three return HTTP 404 on their pricing URL: Cresta, Balto and Observe.AI. So the honest count is four published prices out of twelve, and one of the four is ours, which is a fact about the category and not a boast.

Who writes the Salesloft alternatives lists that rank on Google?

Competitors, almost entirely. We looked at the first results page for Salesloft alternatives on 6 October 2026 and found nine results. Seven were published by a company selling a competing product: Revenue.io, Supered, Default, Artisan, ZoomInfo, Provena AI and Stealery. One was a software directory, Capterra. One was an independent consultant's blog. The page ranking first is Revenue.io's 12 Salesloft Alternatives, which states in its own summary that Revenue.io is the best Salesloft alternative for Salesforce teams. To its credit it carries an editorial note saying Revenue.io publishes this guide and is included in the comparison and that this is a product-fit guide, not an independent hands-on benchmark, which is more honest than most. Two things still undercut it: it is dated 7 November 2025, before the Clari merger closed, and revenue.io/pricing publishes no price at all, only Contact sales. This page is the tenth vendor written page on the topic and it is written by Objeq, so apply the same discount to it.

Is Objeq a replacement for Salesloft?

No, and it would be dishonest to imply it. Objeq replaces one feature of one product inside Salesloft: the live card on the rep's screen during the call. It has no cadences, no dialer, no email sequencing, no forecasting, no deal boards and no CRM write-back, and Salesloft has all of those. If Salesloft is running your outbound motion, removing it to install a Chrome extension is not a migration, it is a demolition. Objeq is worth looking at in two situations. One, you are shopping for the live coaching half on its own because your team already has a CRM and a dialer it likes. Two, you have Salesloft and your reps still freeze on objections nobody wrote a battlecard for, in which case Objeq sits beside it rather than instead of it. Objeq is $99 and $149 per seat per month, published, one seat, no minimum and no platform fee, and it only works when the call audio plays in a Chrome tab.

Compare / Salesloft alternatives

Salesloft alternatives, and the half of Salesloft nobody on page one is replacing

Q: What are the real alternatives to Salesloft?

It depends which half of Salesloft you are replacing, and almost every list online answers only the first half. Salesloft is now two things in one platform. If you are replacing the cadence and dialer half, meaning multichannel sequences, task ordering, reply handling and CRM activity logging, the direct substitutes are Outreach, Apollo.io, Revenue.io, Reply.io, Outplay and Conquer Cadence. That is what every page on the first results page writes about. If you are replacing Salesloft Conversation Intelligence, the half that puts a battlecard on a rep's screen while the buyer is still talking, the field is completely different: Avoma with its Live Answer Assistant, Trellus, Balto and Cresta on the contact centre side, Zoom Revenue Accelerator inside Zoom calls, and browser side tools such as Objeq. Gong is not on that second list. We read gong.io again on 6 October 2026 and found no real-time, live or during-the-call language on it at all, which is the fourth time this has come out the same way since 30 August.

Objeq whispers the next line on your live sales calls. Try it on your toughest objection →

Salesloft is two products now, and every list of alternatives only replaces the first one. Nine pages rank for this search. Seven are written by a vendor on their own list, and all of them swap out the cadence and dialer half: Outreach, Apollo, Reply, Outplay. Not one of them replaces Salesloft Conversation Intelligence, the half that puts a card on a rep's screen while the buyer is still talking. That shelf holds completely different names: Avoma, Trellus, Balto, Cresta, Zoom, Objeq. Two more facts we measured ourselves on 6 October 2026. salesloft.com/pricing lands on a page titled "Talk to Sales" with no packages and no dollar figures, and the page ranking first for this search publishes no price either. And clari.com now returns HTTP 301 to salesloft.com, while copilot.clari.com still answers 200 under the title "Salesloft CI". This is the tenth vendor written page on this topic and we sell a competing product, so discount it accordingly. What we offer instead is a method: every page named, every page dated, every claim quoted rather than paraphrased.

First, the claim we are not going to make

Salesloft coaches reps during the call. We opened its Conversation Intelligence page on 6 October 2026 before writing a word of this, because the easy pitch against a platform of this size is that it only reports the damage the next morning, and that pitch is false here.

"Give reps real-time AI guidance during calls to handle objections, navigate tough conversations, and deliver confident responses that move deals forward."

"Battlecards surface in real time on every call. Coachable moments become tasks in rep workflows."

Source: Salesloft, Conversation Intelligence, read by us 6 October 2026. The same page carries "4.5/5 on G2" against "4,200+ reviews".

So timing is not the wedge. The mechanism is. A battlecard is content a human on your team wrote in advance, stored, and tagged with a trigger. When the system matches the trigger, the card appears. That is a good design, and on the objections you already anticipated it is arguably the better design, because the words on screen are words your company approved.

It has one failure mode, and it is the same one on every vendor that works this way. The objection that arrives phrased in a way no card covers produces an empty screen. Not a wrong answer, which you could catch. Nothing. We have now measured this same card-and-trigger architecture on Salesloft, Outreach, Balto, Cresta and Avoma, and it is architectural rather than a missing feature. That gap is the only honest thing we sell against here.

What changed since every list on page one was written

Salesloft and Clari are one company, and as of this month the merger is visible in the URL bar rather than only in a press release. Salesloft's own announcement, dated 2 September 2026:

"Less than a year after joining forces with Clari, Salesloft brings two category leaders together under one company, one strategy and one brand."

"Clari Forecast retains the Clari name, reflecting its established recognition in enterprise forecasting."

Source: Salesloft press release, 2 September 2026. The same release states Salesloft is "trusted by more than 4,000 organizations including Adobe, 3M, IBM, and Zoom".

We then measured what that did to the web, with redirect following switched off, on 6 October 2026. clari.com returns HTTP 301 and the location header points at www.salesloft.com. The Clari marketing site is gone as a destination. But the application stayed where it was: copilot.clari.com still returns HTTP 200, and its title tag today reads "Salesloft CI". An existing customer logs in at the old address under a new name. A new buyer typing the old domain lands on another company's homepage.

The login menu on salesloft.com is the cleanest single piece of evidence about what you are buying, and it is sitting in the header of every page:

"Log in to Salesloft · Log in to Clari Forecast · Log in to Conversations · Log in to Drift · Log in to Groove"

Source: the navigation on salesloft.com, read by us 6 October 2026. Five separate logins behind one brand.

Five logins is not a scandal and it is not a reason to rule Salesloft out. It is the honest shape of a platform assembled by acquisition, and the press release says so in its own words. It does matter for two practical questions you should put in writing before you sign: which capabilities are actually unified today, and how the bundle is priced when you take three of the five. Neither has a public answer.

It also dates every competitor's page. The article ranking first for this search is dated 7 November 2025, which is before the merger closed. It is a good article. It is also describing a company that has since rebranded, absorbed another, and changed what it sells you.

Who writes these lists, including this one

We looked at the first results page for "Salesloft alternatives" on 6 October 2026. Nine results. Seven were published by a company selling a competing product: Revenue.io, Supered, Default, Artisan, ZoomInfo, Provena AI and Stealery. One was a software directory, Capterra. One was an independent consultant's blog. Zero hands-on independent tests.

The first result deserves reading closely, because it is better than the genre and still has the genre's problem. Revenue.io's "12 Salesloft Alternatives" carries this note near the top, and we want to credit it, because almost nobody does this:

"Editorial note: Revenue.io publishes this guide and is included in the comparison. This is a product-fit guide, not an independent hands-on benchmark."

Source: Revenue.io, 12 Salesloft Alternatives, dated 7 November 2025, read by us 6 October 2026.

Its summary then says "Revenue.io is the best Salesloft alternative for Salesforce teams", and its comparison table has a "Real-Time Coaching" column in which Revenue.io is the only "Yes", Outreach is "Limited (Kaia)", and Apollo and Gong are "No". And we opened revenue.io/pricing on 6 October 2026: no dollar figure anywhere, the call to action is "Contact sales". So the page that criticises an opaque incumbent is itself opaque. That is not hypocrisy, it is just how this category sells. It does mean nobody on page one can tell you whether anything is cheaper than Salesloft.

Twelve pricing pages, opened today

This is the only part of this page that is hard to argue with, because you can repeat it in fifteen minutes. We requested twelve vendor pricing URLs on 6 October 2026 and recorded the status code and every dollar figure in the served HTML.

Vendor	Pricing URL today	Published per-seat price	What it says it does during the call
Salesloft	Redirects to `/see-it-live`, titled "Talk to Sales"	None. No tiers, no numbers	"Real-time AI guidance during calls to handle objections"; "battlecards surface in real time"
Revenue.io	200	None. "Contact sales"	Claims live coaching via "Moments"
Outreach	301 to `outreach.ai/pricing`, then 200	None. Four named packages, all "Request pricing"	Kaia, "live battlecards" (measured 26 and 30 September 2026)
Gong	200	None. "Per user" plus a platform fee, no figure	Nothing. No real-time, live or during-call language on `gong.io`, fourth check since 30 August
Artisan	200	None. "Request pricing" / "Talk to sales"	Not claimed
Cresta	404	None	"Real-time hints, reminders, and workflows tailored to each conversation"
Balto	404	None	"Real-time answers and guidance on every call"
Observe.AI	404	None	"Real-time assist for live agents"
Avoma	200	$19 / $29 / $39 per recorder seat per month, annual. CI add-on $29	Live Answer Assistant, "handle objections real-time with battle-tested answer cards"
Trellus	200	$99.99 and $149.99 per month, both shown discounted to $34.99	"Real Time Coaching", "adaptive live guidance during calls"
Oliv	200	$19 / $49 / $79 per user per month, plus a $0 tier	Not claimed on the pricing page
Objeq	200	$99 Starter, $149 Pro, per seat per month	A line composed for the objection just spoken, no card written in advance

Four published prices out of twelve, and one of the four is ours. Three vendors return a 404 on their own pricing URL. Five have a pricing page that carries no price. We would rather state that plainly than dress it up, because the useful finding is about the category: you cannot build a cost comparison for this market from public information, so every "more affordable than Salesloft" headline on page one is a guess.

And the row that argues against us is the one worth reading twice. Avoma at $19 a seat plus a $29 Conversation Intelligence add-on is about $48 per seat per month, and that buys during-call objection cards. It is the cheapest published route to this capability we have found, it is half our price, and we are not going to hide it in a footnote. The difference is the mechanism again, cards you author against a line composed on the spot, and if your objections are predictable enough to write cards for, Avoma is the better buy.

How to choose, in one question

Forget the feature grids. Ask which half of Salesloft you are actually replacing.

If you are replacing the cadence and dialer, meaning multichannel sequences, task ordering, reply handling, exclusions and CRM activity logging, then this page is not your page and the seven vendor lists above are genuinely useful. Shortlist Outreach for the closest like-for-like swap, Apollo.io if a contact database bundled in matters more than depth, and Revenue.io if everything must live inside Salesforce. Objeq does none of this and will not pretend otherwise.

If you are replacing Conversation Intelligence, meaning the live card on a rep's screen and the post-call summary, then the cadence lists are the wrong shelf and the names change entirely. Where your audio lives decides it. Agents on a queue in a native softphone: Cresta, Balto, Observe.AI, all quoted, all with an implementation phase. Calls inside Zoom: Zoom Revenue Accelerator. Sellers on Meet, Zoom or Teams joined from a browser tab: Avoma, Trellus, or Objeq.

If you are replacing forecasting, you are shopping against Clari Forecast, which kept its name and is the one product in the merged platform that did. Nothing on this page addresses it, and a conversation tool is not a substitute for it.

And if the honest answer is "none of the three, I just want the price", the thing to do is ask Salesloft for a quote on the exact product mix you need and ask in the same email how the bundle prices when you take Conversation Intelligence without Cadence. That second question is the one the public pages cannot answer, and the answer tells you whether the merger helped you or just raised the floor.

Where Objeq fits, and three places it does not

Objeq is a Chrome extension with a side panel. It hears the buyer through the Chrome tab the call plays in, works out the fear sitting behind the sentence just spoken, and writes a treatment for that sentence. No knowledge base to configure, no card library to author, no bot joining the meeting, audio processed in memory and never stored. $99 per seat per month for Starter and $149 for Pro, published, one seat, no minimum, no platform fee, with a 3-day trial. It also runs in Hebrew end to end, transcription and detection and the whisper itself, which none of the tools on this page do.

Where it is the wrong answer, plainly. It is not a Salesloft replacement, full stop: no cadences, no dialer, no sequencing, no forecasting, no deal boards, no CRM write-back. If your outbound motion runs on Salesloft, pulling it out to install a browser extension is a demolition and not a migration. Second, if your reps work in a native softphone rather than a browser tab, Objeq hears nothing at all, and no price advantage repairs that. Third, if the right answer to your buyers' questions already exists in writing somewhere your team approved, a card library is the better machine than composition, and that is Salesloft's argument and Avoma's argument and it is a good one.

Where it does fit: a small sales team, calls in Chrome, no appetite for an annual contract, and one problem that keeps repeating, which is a rep going quiet on an objection nobody wrote a card for. Give it your hardest objection before you believe any of this.

Questions people ask next

Is Salesloft worth it? That depends on a number neither of us has, which is the whole problem with this search. Salesloft publishes no price, so "worth it" cannot be answered from public information, and every blog post answering it for you is working from the same nothing we are. What we can say is that Salesloft's description of its live layer is specific and accurate, that it has 4,200+ G2 reviews at 4.5/5 by its own citation, and that it now carries five products behind five logins. Price it against the whole motion it runs, not against a per-seat tool.

Is Outreach better than Salesloft? They are the closest pair in this market and neither publishes a dollar figure, so a price comparison is impossible from the outside. One structural difference we measured and nobody advertises: Outreach presents a single sign-in and outreach.io returns a path-mapped 301 to outreach.ai, while Salesloft presents five separate logins. Neither shape is better. We wrote the comparison up in Salesloft vs Outreach.

What about Gong? Different purchase, and this is the one place the lists mislead most. We read gong.io again on 6 October 2026 and found no real-time, live or during-the-call language on it, the fourth time since 30 August that this check has come out the same way. Gong is recording, analytics, deal boards and scorecards, with the value arriving after the call. Revenue.io's own comparison table marks Gong "No" in the real-time column, and on that one point we agree with a competitor. See Gong alternatives and Clari Copilot vs Gong.

Is there a free Salesloft alternative? For the cadence half, Apollo.io has a free tier and so do several smaller sequencers. For the live coaching half the free end is thin: Oliv publishes a $0 tier aimed at non-sellers, and most of what calls itself free in this market is recording rather than guidance. See free sales coaching software for what is actually behind those words.

What happened to Clari Copilot? It is Salesloft Conversation Intelligence now, and the application still answers at copilot.clari.com under the title "Salesloft CI". We wrote that up the same way, measurement by measurement, in Clari Copilot alternatives.

I searched for a Salesloft Chrome extension and landed here. Then you probably want this page instead, which covers what a browser side panel can and cannot do on a live call, and real-time sales coaching extensions.