Is Oliv AI a good replacement for Gong? Only for the half of Gong that writes things down
Every claim below read off oliv.ai and gong.io on September 29, 2026, and quoted rather than summarised · By the Objeq team
The comparison, one row per thing people actually decide on
| Oliv AI | Gong | Objeq | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it calls itself | "Agent OS for Revenue Teams." "Your Revenue Org, Powered by Autonomous Agents" | "Revenue AI OS." Engage, Forecast, Enable, Revenue Graph and AI agents | A Chrome extension that listens to the tab the call is in and writes one line on the rep's screen |
| Published price | Yes. $19 Converse, $49 Sell, $79 Grow, $0 Amplify, per user per month. Engage add-on $29, Agent Actions $0.01 / credit | No number on the page. "Licenses are priced per user" plus "a platform fee" | $99 Starter, $149 Pro, per seat per month, printed on the site |
| Helps during the live call | Feature page says yes ("AI Guidance During Meetings", "live prompts"). No plan bullet mentions it | Not claimed on any page we read | Yes, and it is the only thing it does |
| Where the product's weight sits | Before and after. Brief "30 minutes before every call", follow-up "before the hour is done" | After. Call analytics, Revenue Graph, Forecast, the category it built | During. Nothing before, a debrief after |
| Meeting capture | "Online meeting capture botless or bot based", email, optional Slack, and in-person | Yes, platform-wide | Only calls playing in a browser tab |
| Forecasting | Forecast app, from the $49 Sell plan. Forecaster agent | Forecast, a named pillar of the platform | None |
| Public scale evidence | Nine customer logos, no count published | "3x Leader", 4.8 Gartner, 4.8 G2, 9.2 TrustRadius. Team-size form goes to 10,000+ | Neither. We are new and will not pretend otherwise |
| How it gets in | Self-serve price on the page, per user | Platform rollout, demo and quote | Install the extension, 3-day trial |
Oliv and Gong cells are their own published words. Oliv read 29 September 2026; Gong pricing read 29 September 2026 and Gong Enable read 28 September 2026. Green marks the row winner on that row only, not overall.
The one line that decides this, and Oliv wrote it
We did not have to construct the axis for this comparison. Oliv publishes it, by name, on the page for the agent that handles meetings.
"Gong shows you what happened. Meeting Assistant prepares you for what's next."
"Meeting Assistant sends you a full brief, 30 minutes before every call" … "drafts your follow-up before the hour is done."
"Deal stage, close date, next steps, stakeholders, gaps, and recommended agenda — delivered before the meeting so reps do not walk in cold."
Oliv, Meeting Assistant, oliv.ai/agents/meeting-assistant, read 29 September 2026.Read that as a buying instruction rather than as marketing. If the thing you are unhappy about is that nobody prepares and nobody follows up, Oliv is aimed straight at you and costs $19 to start. If the thing you are unhappy about is that you cannot see what is happening across hundreds of calls and your forecast is fiction, that is the sentence's first half, and the first half is Gong's.
Only one of them will tell you the price
This is the part most "Gong alternative" articles get wrong, usually by quoting a dollar figure for Gong with no source. We opened both pricing pages on the same morning.
Converse "$19 / user / per month" · Sell "$49 / user / per month" · Grow "$79 / user / per month" · Amplify "$0 / user / per month". Add-ons: Engage "$29 / user / month", Agent Actions "$0.01 per credit".
Oliv, oliv.ai/pricing, read 29 September 2026. Converse covers "online meeting capture botless or bot based", "email capture and optional Slack capture" and "in-person meeting capture". Sell adds the "Forecast app" and "sales methodologies and deal risks". Grow adds the "Retain app" and "customer health scorecards and churn risks". Amplify covers "Super Agents: Oliver and Olivia" and "Build custom agents"."Licenses are priced per user. There is a platform fee based on the number of users supported. You can integrate your existing tech stack for free."
Gong, gong.io/pricing, read 29 September 2026. No dollar figure appears on the page. Its first form question is "How big is your team?", with bands 1-50, 51-1,000, 1,001-9,999 and 10,000+.So the honest comparison is $19 a user against a quote. That difference is not a feature gap, it is a procurement gap, and for a team of eight it is usually the whole decision.
See what a live whisper looks like
Price printed on the page · From $99 / seat / mo · cancel in one click
Oliv's plan names changed 19 days ago, and we measured it
If you are reading an older comparison of these two, the Oliv half of it is wrong. Here is the change, from our own notes rather than from somebody else's article.
| Read 10 September 2026 | Read 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Notetaker, $19 / user / mo | Converse, $19 / user / mo |
| Meeting Insights, $29 / user / mo | Sell, $49 / user / mo |
| Deal Insights, $29 / user / mo | Grow, $79 / user / mo |
| A "Real-time Answer Assistant" listed inside the $29 Meeting Insights pack | No "Real-time Answer Assistant" line anywhere on the pricing page |
Three plan names retired, a new four-tier ladder, two higher price points and the removal of the one pricing-page line that promised help inside the call. We are also correcting our own older table on the Gong alternatives page, which still carries the September 10 figures. The lesson for a buyer is boring and useful: open the vendor's pricing page yourself on the day you decide, because in this category nineteen days is enough to invalidate a comparison.
Does either of them help while the call is still running
This is the question we get asked most, and the answer for both is "not in the plan you are buying".
Oliv's pages disagree with each other. On the homepage and the pricing page, read 29 September 2026, there is not a single sentence containing "real-time", "live", "in the moment" or "during the call". On the features page, read the same day, there is a whole block of it:
"Oliv provides live prompts and insights to keep your meetings productive."
Feature names listed: "Live Scorecard", "Live Transcription", "AI Guidance During Meetings", "Instant Call Highlights", "Live CRM Sync", "Live Deals Dashboard".
Oliv, oliv.ai/features, read 29 September 2026. None of these six names appears in the bullets of any of the four plans on the pricing page read the same day.Gong does not claim it at all. We opened the Gong Enable page looking specifically for an in-call claim, because finding one would have changed this page. The coaching mechanisms Gong names there are "AI Call Reviewer + Coaching inbox — Pinpoint skill gaps from real conversations", "AI Trainer + AI Coach + Lessons — Turn past conversations into realistic training scenarios", and "Dry Run — Practice every upcoming customer meeting through live AI role-play before it happens" (Gong Enable, read 28 September 2026). The only "live" on the page is a rehearsal.
If in-call help is the reason you are shortlisting either of them, get the plan name in writing before you sign. A feature on a features page is not a feature in a plan.
So which one should you buy
Buy against the failure you actually have. These two are not answering the same question, and neither is answering ours.
You have hundreds of calls a month, a forecast nobody trusts, and procurement. Gong. The analytics depth and the review footprint exist for exactly that, and nothing on this page tries to talk you out of it.
You have a small team, a dirty CRM, reps who walk into meetings cold, and no appetite for a platform negotiation. Oliv. $19 a user to start, per-user pricing on the page, and a product that is openly built for before and after the meeting.
Your reps are on plenty of calls and lose them at minute four. Neither of these is built for that minute, and that is the only thing Objeq does. It is a Chrome extension, it reads the objection that was actually said instead of matching a card written in advance, it publishes its price, and it runs in Hebrew end to end. It writes nothing to your CRM and replaces nothing on this page, so it sits next to whichever of these two you pick.
Try the live whisper on your own objection
$99 / seat / mo after a 3-day trial · full refund within 14 days of the first charge
Questions people ask next
Can you run Oliv and Gong together?
Technically yes, and Gong's own pricing page says you can integrate your existing tech stack for free. But the overlap is meeting capture and transcription, so you would be paying two vendors to record the same call. Decide which one owns the recording before you sign the second contract.
Is Oliv AI cheaper than Gong?
We cannot say, and neither can anyone who tells you they can. Oliv publishes $19, $49 and $79 per user per month. Gong publishes no figure, so the only honest comparison is "a published price against a quote". Get the Gong quote, then compare it to the Oliv tier you would actually need, which for forecasting is Sell at $49 rather than Converse at $19.
Does Oliv replace a notetaker like Otter or Fathom?
That is closer to what its $19 Converse tier is, and it adds email and optional Slack capture plus in-person meetings, which a browser notetaker does not do. We keep a head-to-head on each: Objeq vs Otter and Objeq vs Fathom.
Where can I read the head-to-head against Objeq?
Each one has its own page, with the same quote-and-date rule as this one: Objeq vs Oliv and Objeq vs Gong. The other competitor-against-competitor page is Gong vs Outreach.
Sources, all opened by us rather than quoted from a summary: oliv.ai/pricing, oliv.ai, oliv.ai Meeting Assistant and oliv.ai/features, all read 29 September 2026; gong.io/pricing read 29 September 2026 and gong.io Gong Enable read 28 September 2026. The September 10 Oliv prices are our own earlier reading of the same pricing page. Objeq's own prices are on our pricing page. Related: Gong alternatives, sales coaching software comparison, top sales coaching software.